By: my69z
16 Jul 2009, 11:28 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 850613 of 850830
Jump to msg. #
Rosen,,,,
have you read the aerial reports that became un confidential a few months ago with 1010 and CMKI ??......no doubt in my mind CMKX/1010 hit "something",,,,,,i'am absolutely positive.....for the 1st time ever,,,,Target D-WJ was not discovered even after all the explorin Shore Gold did,,,( per tha report) ,,,,,C-H target didn't show up til aerial survey and covered 5 lines....Goldak said drill there again "immediately".......think Koch/CMKX simply sat on their butts for the next 3 years???..... L...M....A....O
it refrenced how close certian claims are to SHore Gold,,,"to tha north",,verified it was from the Goldak survey that Kevin refrenced,,,,it even has all coordinates,,,who Koch used for drilling,,,how much spent on what,,,took 46 flights to complete,,,any private land holders addresses,,,,phone numbers and everything....
and it proves little miss Sharon Halldorson isn't some chick who since at least 2003,,,,,juuuust happens to be in tha right place all the time......she's listed as a "consultant"
Out of all the mining companies i've ever looked at,,,,i'v enever seen a single one of'em have such a strong aerial hit and it turn out to be nothing......never,,,
And actually....this is what Goldak said about D-WJ....
Geographic Location
Lat 53-28-55 to 53-29-32 Long 105-04-32 to 105-05-18
SE 1/4 Section 18 Township 52 Range 21W2
" The 179 kimberlite is located about 500M to the south. "
" A very high quality aeromagnetic survey was recently flown over a substantial portion of the FALC area by Goldak Airborne Surveys. Technical specifications of this survey are provided in Casavant (2004). From the survey data, maps of the total magnetic field,
Vertical magnetic gradient, Horizontal Magnetic Gradient and 2nd Vertical Derivative were produced.
These Aeromagnetic maps were examined in detail in an effort to identify significant magnetic features that had been missed or passed over by the lower quality predecessor aeromagnetic surveys. Anomlay D-WJ-7 is one of several anomalies with the characteristics that are associated with kimberlitic intrusives that were selected for further
investigation. These anomalies appear to have remained untested throughout the intense exploration activity that has taken place in the FALC area. Anomaly D-WJ-7 is one such anomaly. It was recognized on the 2nd Vertical derivative map by Geologist Wm. Jarvis. "
" Aeromagnetic Survey
Flight line 2190 of the airborne magnetic survey passes directly over anomaly D-WJ-7. A portion of the total magnetic field and measured vertical gradient profiles in the vicinity of this anomaly are included herewith as Figure 6. The location of Anomaly D-WJ-7
and another significant anomaly (Anomaly D, i.e., the 179 kimberlite) are indicated on this figure. The large anomaly just to the south of Anomaly D is caused by a source at the depth of the crystalline basement.
Anomaly D-WJ-7, discernable on the total magnetic field and 2nd vertical derivative maps, occurs just to the north of a known kimberlite held by Shore Gold Inc. (Anomaly D on the Airmag Map). Anomaly E nearby is also related to a known kimberlite, held by
Shore Gold.
Ground Magnetometer Survey:
The ground magnetic survey was conducted between July 2 and July 5, 2006 using a geoMetrics G-858 Cs magnetometer.
The prismatic source determined from the above analysis is very small by standards of the Fort a la Corne kimberlite field. Nevertheless, the source has dimensions of the order of magnitude expected for kimberlites, and occurs at the expected depth.
Anomaly D-WJ-7 should be tested. A drill hole located on line 494500 E, at 5926035 N will provide a proper test of this anomaly. If present, the kimberlite should be encountered between depths of 95 M and 110 M.
Second part of that report....."Work Summary Report"
Anomaly D-WJ-7
Work Performed on Mineral Disposition S-136792.
Group claim disposition numbers: S-136235, S-137390, S-137391, S-136792, S-136793,
S-136789
Disposition Holder: 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd.
Box 63
Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, S0H 4C0
Processing and Reporting: H. D. Mac Lean, P. Geoph (5 days)
Review: W. Jarvis, P. Geol. (1 day)
Consultant: Sharon Halldorson (6 days)
Diamond Office Works Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------
Another target....
This report describes the 2005 diamond drilling program carried out by 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. on a
magnetic anomaly to test for the presence of diamondiferous kimberlite. This exploration program consisted of
the drilling of one hole in an attempt to explore for an economic diamondiferous kimberlite. Claim number S –
136796, is on the known White Swan - Fort a’la Corne geological trend that is known to host several
diamondiferous kimberlites. The drilling was carried out between November 25, 2005 thru December 7, 2005.
This project area is located approximately 50 kilometers northeast of Prince Albert on NTS sheet 73 – H – 06.
This is approximately 10 kilometers east of Weirdale, Saskatchewan then proceeding south approximately 5
kilometers down the Fort a’ la Corne Road.
The mineral exploration program carried out by 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. consisted of contracting K.M.S.
Energy Systems Inc. out of Tuxford, Saskatchewan to drill test specific magnetic anomalies in the project area.
Diamond drilling commenced on November 25, 2005 and was completed on December 7, 2005. One drill hole
was completed to a total of 188.1 meters
The 2005 winter drilling program carried out by 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. did not intersect kimberlite;
however the drill program did test additional magnetic anomalies that are not located directly on the Whiteswan-
Fort a’ la Corne kimberlite trend. This anomaly was drill tested as part of a program to test several magnetic
anomalies held by 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Kimberlites have been discovered by War Eagle Mining, east and south of White Swan Lake, by Uranerz Mining
and Exploration in the Fort a’ la Corne – Smeaton areas of Saskatchewan and by Shore Gold Inc. in the Fort a’ la
Corne area of Saskatchewan. These areas are all within close proximity of numerous 101047025 Saskatchewan
Ltd. mineral claims that host magnetic anomalies that may indicate the presence of diamondiferous kimberlite at
depth; this being the case drill testing of selected magnetic anomalies should continue in order to locate a possible
diamondiferous kimberlite.
And Sharon was listed again as a "consultant"...
--------------------------------------
A 3rd target...i'll seperate post,,,,
Narrow Hills Provincial Park - west of and Birchbark Lake areas
By: my69z
16 Jul 2009, 11:28 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 850615 of 850831
(Reply to 850613 by my69z)
Jump to msg. #
Remeber what Kevin said about CMKX's "Goldak survey" with 1010 from tha FAQ's ??...look it up and cross refrence it with this third target,,,,
from the report..... " 1. INTRODUCTION
This report describes an airborne geophysical survey carried out over the Fort à la Corne Forest area of Central Saskatchewan. The tri-axial magnetic gradiometer survey was carried out by Goldak Airborne Surveys (GOLDAK) on behalf of 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. between April 3 and June 16, 2004. "
Work Assessment Information
Description
Fixed wing airborne magnetic and gradiometer survey
Magnetic Study/Review of Anomaly C-H
Report, 41 Geosoft colour maps on one CD ROM
by E Koch, D MacLean, and B Goldak
NOTE: This survey is also covered by assessment
files 73H-0010 and 73H-0011
TECHNICAL REPORT ON A FIXED WING
AEROMAGNETIC SURVEY
Fort à la Corne Forest Area
Central Saskatchewan
for 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd.
By
GOLDAK AIRBORNE SURVEYS
November 8, 2005
Emerson K. Koch
PO Box 63,
Tuxford, SK S0H 4C0
,
Letter Report
Magnetic Study
Anomaly C-H
Goldak Aeromagnetic Survey
Prince Albert SK Area
202 North Ave., PMB 252
Grand Junction
Subject: Review of Ground and Airborne Magnetic Surveys of Anomaly C-H
(Birchbark Lake Area) Goldak Aeromagnetic Survey, Prince Albert Area, SK.
Dear Mr. Koch,
A ground magnetic confirmation survey has been completed on Anomaly H, Block C of
the Goldak airborne survey in the Prince Albert area. The survey was conducted in order
to confirm and verify the indications of a possible shallow magnetic source at this
location. The ground survey operations were terminated when a pair of drill collars was
encountered in the middle of the planned ground survey grid. It was assumed that the
anomaly had been drilled and explained. However, a re-examination of the survey results
was prompted when it was later learned that the drilling results did not explain this very
prominent airborne anomaly. It is recommended that the suspended ground magnetic
survey be completed immediately.
The review of the airborne survey contour maps and profiles confirmed the indications of
a magnetic intrusive at this site. From simple observation of the magnetic profiles, the
top of the causative body appears to be located at a depth of about 200M i.e., the
expected depth of the base of the glacial till, and the approximate depth at which
kimberlites have been located elsewhere in the Fort a la Corne (FALC) area. However,
closer examination of the aeromagnetic profiles indicates that the source is off line.
Furthermore, the limited ground magnetic survey work in this area indicates that the
source of the aeromagnetic anomaly is not directly below the anomalous flight lines, but
is off line or fragmented. It would appear that both of the drill holes at this site failed to adequately test the magnetic source.
H.David Mac Lean, P. Geoph
Letter Report on Magnetic Anomaly C-H October 24, 2005
Prince Albert SK Aeromagnetic Survey Page 2 of 8
Anomaly C-H is a prominent feature on the total field aeromagnetic map prepared by
Goldak Airborne Surveys; it had been selected as a possible kimberlite indicator well in
advance of my involvement with this project. The additional investigations described in
this letter were initiated only after it was realized that the drill test at this site that was
conducted last winter did not adequately explain this magnetic feature.
Review of aeromagnetic survey
A portion The aeromagnetic map of Block F of the Casavant Aeromagnetic Survey
(Goldak, 2004) shows a semi circular anomaly adjacent to a much larger feature
associated with a source within the crystalline basement. The anomaly can be seen on the
excerpt of Block C of the Goldak survey that is included herewith as Attachment 3
(c-hAirMagTF.pdf). Also, the anomaly is well defined on the 2nd vertical derivative map
(Attachment 4; c-hAirMag2ndDeriv.pdf, and the vertical gradient map (Attachment 5;
c-hAirMagVG.pdf. All of the above referenced maps were prepared by Goldak Airborne
Surveys. The ¼ inch diameter circular feature visible on the excerpt of the 2nd Vertical
derivative map, and the similar feature on the vertical gradient map resemble the patterns
observed at many known kimberlite locations. The gradient and derivative maps just
mentioned show that anomaly C-H is associated with a true, measured anomalous
magnetic gradient; the anomaly is not simply an artifact of the data processing and contouring.
The model shown is inconsistent with a
prismatic body, the top of which occurs just at the surface of the underlying sedimentary
rocks (depth below sensor of 200 to 220 M). However, the suggested model, a magnetic
unit within the crystalline basement, is also inconsistent with the observed vertical
magnetic gradient profiles. It appears that the airborne magnetic profiles have been
distorted, possibly by remnant magnetism in the causative magnetic unit.
If the total magnetic field data is considered to the exclusion of all other information, the
intrusion appears to sub crop between lines 2110 and 2120 (between UTM easting of
492900 and 493100) and between UTM northing of 5930400 and 5930600. This is of
course where the drill hole at this site was located (493054E, 5930437N). However, it
should be noted that the vectors shown on Attachment 6 (the horizontal gradient t map)
indicate a strong westward trending horizontal component to the magnetic field. The
peak in the total field anomaly appears to be displaced eastward from the position it
would assume in the absence of this remnant magnetism component.
The possibility that the peak in the airborne anomaly has been shifted eastward is born
out by the limited ground magnetic survey that was conducted in the vicinity of this
anomaly. The magnetic profile of the line that passed directly over the drill collars
showed no anomalous response. However, a significant magnetic anomaly can be
observed on the profile of the line that was run 150 M to the west.
Analysis
No anomalous magnetic response is evident on the profile of line 493000E. The ground
magnetic survey does not support the indications of a strong magnetic anomaly that are
seen in the airborne magnetic profiles shown in Attachments 9 & 10. The anomalous
responses seen in the airborne profiles have obviously been displaced, or they are
artifacts. Since the response is apparent on 5 separate lines it is unlikely that it could be
any sort of artifact of the processing.
A very strong magnetic anomaly is evident on Attachment 14, which is the ground profile
run 150M to the west. The half width indicates a magnetic source at a relatively shallow
depth.
The above mentioned model study indicates a source underlying line 492850E at a depth
of 200M. The magnetic unit extends from 5930200 to 5930300. However, the calculated
depth appears to be excessive for a source contained within the sedimentary rocks at the
base of the glacial till. The profile appears to be distorted; line 492850 probably does not transect source. The magnetic unit may lie still farther east. Additional ground magnetic
survey data should be obtained to accurately locate this source.
The anomaly as it appears on the airborne maps seems to have been displaced eastward.
However, it is also possible that the airborne response is a composite of multiple sources,
none of which underlie the anomaly peak. Accordingly, it is imperative that the ground
magnetic survey be completed.
The causative body for the airborne survey can be
located more reliably by the ground survey because the sensor is closer to the source.
It is recommended that a survey consisting of seven NS lines spaced at 100 M intervals
centered on line 492800 be completed. After the causative body or bodies have been
located by means of this ground survey, a second drill test of the anomaly C-H area
should be initiated.
Although the terrain in the vicinity of this anomaly is swampy, the ground survey work
could be completed this fall, prior to the winter freeze. The work could be completed in
two or three days.
References
___________2004. “Technical Report on Fixed Wing Aeromagnetic Survey, Fort a la
Corne Forest Area, Central Saskatchewan” Goldak Airborne Surveys, Proprietary Report
for Cassavant Kimberlite Mining Company Limited.
No comments:
Post a Comment